The War on Montana’s Wildlife
Posted by JB on March 2, 2013 at 8:55 pm | Last modified: March 2, 2013 8:55 pmHELENA – For Republican state Sen. John Brenden and many of his Eastern Montana neighbors, the idea of bison roaming the Montana plains as wildlife is absurd — and they want to do what they can to stop it.
Representative Alan Redfield (R) Park County is leading the anti-Montana Bison crowd near Yellowstone Park and Senator John Brenden (R) Scobey is leading the anti-Montana Bison crowd in NE Montana.
Interestingly, Senator Brenden is partial owner of Brenden Farms, which is heavily subsidized with your tax dollars to the tune of $523,908.38 in farm subsidy program payments from 1995-2011:
“Buffalo have their place in the world, but it isn’t going back to the 1850s,” Brenden said last week. “It’s no different than the dinosaurs. We’re living in a modern world, whether we like it or not …. We don’t need free-roaming buffalo.”
Brenden, a farmer from Scobey, is sponsoring a bill to prohibit moving wild bison from Yellowstone National Park herds to anywhere in Montana except the National Bison Range in Moiese.
His bill also creates a year-round hunting season for bison, allowing any hunter who pays $125 to shoot up to three bison.
“(My bill) says if the National Park Service and the feds don’t want to cull (the Yellowstone bison herd), we’ll cull them ourselves, when they come on private property,” he said.
Brenden’s bill isn’t the only one this session taking a whack at Montana’s bison management policies.
As the 2013 Legislature reaches its midpoint, a half-dozen bison bills are still alive, doing everything from requiring the state to remove bison from private property outside Yellowstone National Park to allowing landowners to shoot any “wild bison” that come on their property.
The wave of bison legislation is from Republican lawmakers who say they’re responding to heightened landowner concerns about bison encroaching on farms, ranches and other private property, not only near Yellowstone National Park but also in Eastern Montana, where wildlife advocates are talking about possible free-roaming herds of bison on mostly public prairies.
Opposing the bills are wildlife and hunting groups, state wildlife managers and Indian tribes, who say the bills derail a 2-year-old compromise that set up a planning process with tightly drawn restrictions on how or where bison could be “translocated” somewhere in the state besides near Yellowstone Park.
“We’re saying, rather than have a whole flood of new bills and supersede what we’re trying to do, as we work through a process — let’s let the process work, and see what the results are,” said Jeff Hagener, director of the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
Several Indian tribes also say many of the bills trample treaty rights for tribal members to hunt bison that range outside Yellowstone National Park.
“If that happens, it’s going to be a chaotic situation,” said John Harrison, an attorney for the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes in Western Montana. “I guarantee there will be litigation. … When (tribes) talk about treaty rights, it’s as sacred to them as the Constitution is to American citizens.”
Two years ago, the Legislature passed a law that said the state must adopt a management plan before allowing wild bison to be transplanted to any private or public land in Montana.
The state is preparing an environmental review that examines where wild bison could be located in Montana other than near Yellowstone National Park. If some areas are identified, the next step is working with local groups of citizens on what safeguards should be in place if relocation might occur, Hagener said.
“Anywhere we’d put them in, we’d look at managing them on the landscape,” Hagener said. “What is the intent for that herd? How big would it be? What’s our long-term goal?”
Brenden, who chairs the Senate Fish and Game Committee, and Rep. Jeff Welborn, R-Dillon, wrote Hagener a letter late last month, asking about department plans for relocating bison.
Hagener replied a week later, saying the issue has spawned “no small amount of speculation, rumor and misinformation about bison management.”
In the letter, Hagener said the department has no current plans to move bison anywhere outside the Greater Yellowstone Area, and if translocation is considered in the future, it would follow the process in the 2011 law. He also said there are no plans to move any new bison to tribal lands in Montana.
Welborn said last week he thought Hagener’s letter addressed many concerns, and showed that the agency has “a genuine interest in bringing all of the stakeholders to the table and working out solutions.”
But the letter hasn’t stopped the flood of bills attempting to change state policy on bison.
Brenden’s Senate Bill 143 is an extensive rewrite of bison hunting and management policy, and House Bill 484, from Rep. Alan Redfield, R-Livingston, would direct state agencies to take certain actions when Yellowstone bison come onto private property.
Redfield, a rancher in Paradise Valley, said last week that his bill merely clarifies how the state departments of Livestock and Fish, Wildlife and Parks should handle bison that leave the park and cause problems on private property.
Tom France of Missoula, the senior director for western wildlife conservation at the National Wildlife Federation, said his group and others believe wild bison can be restored on and near the C.M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge, which surrounds a remote stretch of the Missouri River in northeast Montana.
Bison could be viewed by eco-tourists and hunted, he said, “with really minimal conflicts and a great deal of benefit” to the area.
The Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks should be allowed to study that possibility and other options for wild bison, France said.
“Until we have a result from that (process), it seems premature to be passing legislation that second-guesses it,” he said.
Wildlife advocates and state wildlife officials also say the bills revert state bison policy to what existed in the late 1980s and 1990s, when hundreds of bison were slaughtered by hunters and fish-and-game personnel when the animals left Yellowstone Park, causing a national outcry.
Pat Flowers, the state Fish, Wildlife and Parks regional director in Bozeman, said last week that HB484 essentially “requires that no bison will come out of Yellowstone National Park into Montana, ever.”
“This is very similar to the approach we took in the late 1980s,” he said. “It’s a failed policy then, it’s a failed policy now. This bill will take us right back to that same point in time.”
Brenden, however, said he and others are only seeking a balance in bison policy, and that if landowner concerns aren’t addressed, sportsmen’s groups should be worried about the backlash.
“People have closed up their properties to hunting because of the actions of Fish, Wildlife and Parks on this translocation of buffalo,” he said. “If we don’t get this bison thing solved, there won’t be hundreds of thousands of acres locked up, there will be millions of acres.
Senator Brenden is sponsoring the anti-Montana Bison Bill SB 143, which can be read here: http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2013/billpdf/SB0143.pdf
Representative Redfield is sponsoring his anti-Montana Bison Bill HB 484, which can be read here: http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2013/billpdf/HB0484.pdf
We are hopeful that HB 484 has or will be killed in the House Appropriations Committee.
You can contact both Representative Redfield and Senator Brenden or any given committee here: http://leg.mt.gov/css/Sessions/63rd/legwebmessage.asp
Read more: http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/landowner-fears-anger-stoke-barrage-of-bison-policy-bills-at/article_1437bbfa-c276-524e-9a41-3c190c5a96d9.html#ixzz2MPxVrn7T
2012 SEASON IN REVIEW-2013 BOOKING & DATES
Posted by JB on November 29, 2012 at 9:00 pm | Last modified: November 29, 2012 9:00 pmWhen moments are seized, appreciated, slowed down, they’re a branded into the soul. As an Outfitter, I feel especially blessed because I’m able to take with me everyone’s same memories, therefore I know have the stories.
The 2012 season ended up with nearly 70% success overall, which is about 60 percent higher than the general average! Dome Mountain Ranch continues to provide the kind of fair chase, traditional hunting that more and more folks are looking for. After all, we provide the full experience. While there are plenty of places that will drive you around in a truck and help you walk up and shoot an elk, most would agree that there’s nothing like the hunt, the real thing.
It’s about tradition. Our hunts are about the ethics that go above the rules of the law and place the hunter on a more equal playing field with wild things. Those who shared the mountain with us leave with new appreciations for our wild places and the privilege we have to gain in mind, body and soul from the earth, from those things that are natural. Of course, we’ll continue to strive for this and raise the bar.

Elk hunters come to Dome Mountain Ranch from all over seeking a traditional style fair chase hunt-and often score on trophy Elk.If I’ve talked too much about the end result and the daylight realities, I’d like to make sure I talk about the things that clients will rarely see happen, but eventually realize that these are the factors that make all the difference. These are the defining moments when a hunter makes the decision to do things the right way. I’ve always commented that if we continue to do things that promote the future of hunting for all, then we’re doing okay. However, when our actions as seen in the public light, hunter or not, do things to contribute to the commercialization and defeat hunting’s future, then we need to re-evaluate our actions.After chasing elk around for about the last 20 years and being a part of thousands of hunts, I’ll be the first to admit that I’ll never figure it out completely. However, I figure I can offer an opinion or two (as most of you know). I’ve been able to see the mountain from both sides, in the saddle, in the rocks, on the top and from the bottom. From the air, and through the seasons, rest assured that without basic habitat, none of what we have been able to share here at Dome Mountain Ranch would be available.The balance between predator and prey may have finally returned
Opening day started out just like most opening days. The start of elk season on Dome Mountain is always an interesting event, especially opening morning. While we knew there were elk on the mountain, we also knew from experience that more would come if we waited. We were not disappointed. As several wolves ran by my glassing spot bumping Mule deer out of the Daily hay fields, from out of nowhere 300 plus elk seemed to appear, cows, calves, spikes, brush bulls and a few toads. This signified that our low impact, careful and controlled style of elk hunting was working. As an added bonus, many of successes came from public land, high on the mountain where the daily distractions aren’t seen or heard. These are the real special ones. We even had a couple “doubles” which at this point, I can only thank the mojo and the positive attitude of our guides and guests.
Mid-way through the season we did get a quick and heavy snow which melted then froze over the grass which made foraging more difficult for the Elk. It is confirmed that many of the few remaining elk inside Yellowstone Park did migrate. One difference could be that few public hunters were on site near the well-known Deckard Flats. However, our friend and fellow outfitter near this area did find some success on confirmed migratory bulls.
In seasons past the areas around Jardine, Eagle Creek, Bear Creek and the general public land boundary of the park see a large amount of vehicle traffic. In years past those not capable of heading into the hills had mastered road hunting in this area. In spite of the vehicle traffic, Elk would eventually try to cross. It wasn’t unusual to see trophy bulls loaded whole in the back of pick-up trucks. It would seem that the old days are gone, but maybe it’s just that the old styles of hunting down in this neck of the woods are gone and many of us may once again be able to enjoy chasing wild elk on public lands. I’m already looking forward to next year’s archery season and returning to these places where we’ve had so much success before, but then saw them change dramatically as the result of the introduction of wolves.
The ability to hunt wolves has been a long time coming and more than likely is a huge contributing factor. Thus far, sound wildlife science has prevailed. Let’s hope that another frivolous, money wasting lawsuit doesn’t slow down the return of modern wildlife science. Although a few wolves have been harvested in our area, there’s still quite a few around. The winter hunt and trapping should provide the opportunity to bring back more of a balance. Who knows, maybe even those of us who only have a weekend here or there to hunt elk will once again here the bugles from the high country in places available for everyone to hunt.
So, why was this year such a successful year in killing? The answers are more often than not simple, yet complex in their relationship to the end result. Once sufficient habitat is provided for wild things, then it’s a matter of making the most out of their habits and the opportunities they’ll provide. You can bet it’s never going to be easy, and if it does become easy, I’ll probably try something different.
By the close of the season, we all realized that having well-prepared clients who are willing to endure the rigors that only a traditional style hunt can provide helped keep spirits high and hands bloodied. Not many elk get killed from the couch.
There were definitely fewer hunters around. Perhaps this was due to our new special permits, or maybe folks are taking advantage of increased elk numbers in other areas of the state where opportunities were limited, but now changed since new predators pushed many elk to old stomping grounds.
To close, it’s safe to say I learned more this season and saw things that I haven’t for a long time, good or bad, we all learn a valuable lesson to take with us the next time we’re out there. I won’t soon forget the adventures of 2012. Thanks to all of you for helping us make Dome Mountain Ranch a better place to be.
2013 PRE-BOOKING SPECIALS, SEASON DATES & WHAT’S NEXT!
ARCHERY: We’ll be offering both Elk and Mule Deer combination hunts next fall. Our dates will be flexible in order to make travel less expensive and more suitable to our clients. Therefore, if you are interested in an archery hunt for next season, please call me TODAY!
2013 RIFLE HUNTING DATES: Hunts will be 5 days in duration with an arrival/preparation day on the front end of the hunt week and a departure day on each end.
800-313-4868 TOLL FREE
406-223-0009 JB’s HUNTING HOTLINE!
“See You on the Mountain”
Outfitter #7843 JB Klyap
WEEK I: October 26th-October 30th
WEEK II: November 6th-November 5th
WEEK III: November 17th-November 21st
WEEK IV: November 27th-December 1st (Thanksgiving week)
SPECIAL: Return client discount of $500 current rates, plus Mule Deer Trophy fee 50% off at time of booking. ENDS DECEMBER 31st, 2012

















